Another Blog From Neosecularist.com

Posts Tagged ‘racism’

Just Abort Black Babies (And Maybe The Hispanic And Latino Ones)

In abortion, culture, politics, racism, right to life on June 21, 2012 at 10:48 am

A South Carolina Church is in deep trouble with the Arianna Nation for a sign it has posted outside its church doors which reads, “Ultimate Racism – Abortion Targets Black Babies”.  This is not a laughter matter to the liberal pro-aborts over there who never miss an opportunity to condemn anyone for trying to stop an abortion, or speak out against it.  But when we talk explicitly and candidly about abortion, what abortion really is – the killing of an unborn child – the folks that support the killing of unborn children under the guise of “reproductive choice” become indignant and restless.  And that includes other blacks, as the Arianna Nation point out:

The sign was eventually taken down due to pressure from African-American leaders.

So – wouldn’t this problem of abortion go away much faster if only black babies were aborted, and Hispanic and Latino babies as well?   And, couldn’t we learn a lot from the Chinese about abortion, and bring that knowledge to America, to every single black and Hispanic and Latino, and Asian, community in America, where that information is sorely welcome and encouraged by other blacks and Hispanics and Latinos?

It isn’t whites killing black babies in the womb.  It’s black mothers making the conscious decision to kill their babies in the womb that ultimately leads to the killing of black babies in the womb.  Or, if we wanted to take the pro-abort position, what is in that woman’s womb isn’t even a black child to begin with, so that helps to ease the conscience as the abortionist plunges their deadly sharp instrument of torture into her to remove whatever it is inside her womb she things she is better living without.

If that is not a black child inside the womb, then perhaps we can make the case that there is nothing racist with pro-aborts setting up abortion clinics in black neighborhoods and encouraging black women to have abortions, rather than give birth, because they are poor, single, unmarried women whose babies fathers have abandoned them.  But, if that is a black child inside the womb, and Planned Parents is encouraging the woman to abort it – what are we supposed to call that?  Isn’t that the message this church was trying to convey with its sign?

Advertisements

Another “Yawner” For The MSM – White Woman Beaten By Three Blacks

In hate crime, politics, racism on May 23, 2012 at 10:40 am

My, how loudly the crickets are chirping.  Yet another story of a white person (a woman this time) being attacked and beaten up by blacks, and although the woman was referenced as a “white b*tch” by her black assailant, there has not been even a murmur, a hushed whisper within the MSM.  Granted, this does not appear to be a premeditated crime.  However, if a white gets out of his car because he does not like something the person in the car ahead of him has said, or done, without knowing the person is black, and the white assaults the black, even if it is not premeditated or predicated on the basis of race, wouldn’t the white still be charged with a hate crime anyway?  Wouldn’t Jesse “Wormtongue” Jackson and Al “Uncle Tom” Sharpton spearhead the unruly mob to demand that this white person be charged with a hate crime and sentenced appropriately?  These typical double standards by the MSM need to be thrown back in their hypocritical faces constantly.  What if it turns out this white woman who was attacked by three blacks is a liberal, pro-abortion, pro-Obama, Democrat feminist?  What is the MSM to do then?  Either abolish “hate” crimes, or apply the rule to everyone equally.  The “can’t we all just get along” idea won’t become a reality until we all realize that race as defined by color of skin is irrelevant, and that culture or ethnic background is a wedge issue not part of the so-called melting pot.  We are all humans and we are all part of the human race.  DNA is absolutely indistinguishable from one human to the next, regardless of color, ethnicity, etc.  And one American citizen is no more superior, or no less inferior, to another American citizen.  Race- baiters and hustlers like Jackson and Sharpton, Farrakhan and his Nation of Islam, and even the New Black Panther Party will not abide by this.  They will continue their assault on the human race for their own financial profit and gain.  For their own racist views, for their own “hate” they and their followers will be sucked into that vacuous, infinite nothingness that awaits them all.  Is it worth it to you to get sucked in as well?  Or can you finally accept that crime against anyone is crime against humanity, and ought to be punished for the sake, for the good of humanity?

Throwing “Bottles And Other Objects” At Blacks Is Neither Taunting, Provoking Or Criminal – Just Ask Jesse Kornbluth

In culture, hate crime, racism on May 7, 2012 at 5:38 pm

A big deal has been over the Kent State killings, brought about by protesters throwing beer bottles and rocks at police from three hundred feet away, and whether the fact that police were 300 hundred away, and at a presumably “safe” distance” from actual harm, the four students killed by police, as a result of this violent activity, was unwarranted and unjustified.  Well, now we have a story out of Cornell University that  “a group of people on the roof of the Sigma Pi fraternity house reportedly threw bottles and other objects at black students who were walking by the house early Sunday morning”.  There were also, allegedly, invoking the Trayvon Martin shooting.  Now, and this is the most important part – was this group three feet away from these blacks, because just how far a distance they were is imperative to whether or not there was actually any criminal intent, or whether it was a harmless act, according to Jesse Kornbluth, who firmly believes that the protesters at Kent State were unjustifiably shot at because they were three hundred feet away from police when they threw bottles at them.  So, the question begs this answer – is there an appropriate distance at which anybody, protesters included, must remain behind when they are throwing bottles, rocks and other objects at people?  Or – is throwing anything at anyone, at any distance, inappropriate?  Or – is it only appropriate to throw bottles and other objects at police, and only when it is being done by protesters, and liberal protesters at that, as Jesse Kornbluth insinuates?  The fate of this group of people who threw “bottles and other objects” at blacks hinges on the answer to this, and to this question – if police happened to be in the area at the time the group was throwing bottles from the roof at black students, and the police opened fire, killing one or more of them, would Jesse Kornbluth have approved of this tactic, and would he have included the killing of these people among “the most popular murders ever committed in America”?

Democrat Neo-Nazi Kills Family, He’s Dead Too…

In politics, racism, slavery on May 3, 2012 at 10:20 am

Democrat Wolves in Sheets For Clothing

Liberals will not like this.  A neo-Nazi who was running for sheriff of Pinal County as a Democrat has killed his family.  He’s dead too.  When do we ever hear about a Republican neo-Nazi running for any political office?  For that matter, when do we ever hear about a Republican neo-Nazi?  Throughout American history it has been Democrats, not Republicans, who have support slavery; who have supported segregation; who have been members of the KKK; who have been the real racists.  Juan Williams, as a liberal, will continue to have the audacity, as all liberals do, to call Tea party members racist, but refuse to offer one solid piece of evidence.  And, as always, the liberal MSM will continue to ignore it.  This story of the Democrat neo-Nazi serves as at least one piece of evidence that Democrats can be racists and are more prone, more capable, more committed to, more sympathetic to, more likely to be and to support, racism.  Want another piece of evidence?  Google Democrat Senator Robert Byrd.  Now – where’s that evidence that the Tea Party is racist?

Could This Picture Of Trayvon Martin Be Worth A Thousand Pardons To George Zimmerman?

In George Zimmerman, photography, politics, Trayvon Martin on April 24, 2012 at 11:46 pm

This image is the photograph the late Trayvon Martin used to represent his Twitter identity in late 2011, under the screen name "T33ZY_TAUGHT_M3." Although the Twitter account was deleted, The Daily Caller retrieved it from the social analytics website PeopleBrowsr. The upper-arm tattoo in the image matches one in a close-up photograph on Martin's MySpace page. (Image: Twitter)

Would the MSM dare show this “adult” picture of Trayvon Martin to its liberal audience?  (Click the photo to read the full story)  For tens of millions of Americans who get their news daily from the MSM, have they seen this rather unflattering and vulgar photo of Trayvon Martin?  Would the MSM ever show this photo, or would they keep on showing older photos of Trayvon, during more “innocent” times in his life?  The liberal MSM has, from the very beginning portrayed Trayvon Martin as the victim of a hate crime; a sweet, lovable, innocent young teenage boy who could not possible commit a crime of any kind, or hurt or harm another living human soul.  The photographs they have used of Trayvon have all been taken from when he was a young teenager. An angelic little boy who could not hurt a fly.  That is what the MSM is saying, subliminally, when it distributes this older photo of Trayvon.  Compare that to the photograph the MSM frequently rehashes of George Zimmerman, Trayvon’s killer.

Zimmerman looks tired, disheveled, mean, gravelly, dirty, nasty, guilty!  That is exactly what the MSM wants everyone to believe, regardless of what the evidence has to say.  And look at this oft rehashed photo of Trayvon and Zimmerman side by side:

Do you see what the MSM is intentionally doing, implying, planting in your head by showing these two photos side by side?  The MSM is saying, “Look, this big, mean, nasty George Zimmerman over here on the right murdered this sweet little boy, Trayvon Martin, on the left.”  But what the MSM is not telling you is that that sweet little boy had done a lot of growing up since the time that photo was taken.  None of that in any way indicates Trayvon’s guilt, and Zimmerman’s innocent, or vice-versa.  However, neither does portraying Zimmerman as an evil white man who murdered the little black boy in the red shirt represented in the above photo automatically indicate Zimmerman’s guilt.  The MSM is playing a shell game with its audience, switching photos, shuffling them around, hiding others, all in the hopes it can pull the wool over your eyes and make you believe Zimmerman is guilty of murder, whether he actually is or not.  The trial has yet to begin, Zimmerman is out on bail and even now the myriad death threats against Zimmerman keep pouring in.  All because of how the MSM has reported on this tragic and disturbing incident from the beginning by portraying Trayvon as the victim and Zimmerman as a cold-blooded murderer, without any evidence, as of yet, to back it up.  The photo of Trayvon giving his middle finger may not be enough to clear Zimmerman, but the shoddy and unprofessional and blatantly biased journalism and media coverage by the MSM just might be enough to set Zimmerman free, if no pertinent evidence can be introduced.  And what is that going to mean if, down the road, sometime after Zimmerman is freed, new evidence pops up to prove Zimmerman actually was guilty of killing Trayvon in cold blood, not in self-defense?  There will be no double jeopardy for Zimmerman, who cannot then be tried a second time for the same crime, but there sure as hell ought to be double trouble for the MSM, and double more after that.

“I Said Walk The Dogs” Obama Cartoon Racist?

In Barack Obama, Mia Love, political cartoons, politics, satire on April 23, 2012 at 10:06 am

Why is it every time a cartoon depicting Barack and/or Michelle Obama, or any black liberal politician, must automatically be classified as racist?  Liberals degrade and dehumanize black conservatives every chance they get, routinely satirizing, and ridiculing, and mocking blacks for being conservative “sell-outs” and “traitors“.  Liberals also completely ignore it when black conservatives, like Mia Love, wins her party’s nomination, and has a hell of a good chance to win her congressional seat this November and become the only black conservative woman in congress.  Now – imagine Mia winning, and becoming that “only black female conservative in congress” for a moment.  How much attention is the MSM going to give to Mia and her accomplishment?  How much attention would the MSM give to Mia if she were a black liberal?  (And keep in mind she is running her campaign from conservative, and Mormon, stronghold, Utah.)  If Mia was liberal, and won, the MSM would have a field day, celebrating and gloating the fact that a black woman, and a liberal from Utah has uprooted this “backwards” society of “religious nuts”.  Now – back to reality.  Mia is a black conservative woman.  When/if she wins in November, what will be the response from the MSM?  For an answer, close your eyes, stop up your ears, and tune everything out for about two years.  That should about do it.  The MSM could not get enough of Barack Obama when he won the Senate seat from Illinois, and the MSM has not stopped paying attention to him since.  So, when anyone parodies or makes fun of (lightheartedly) Barack Obama, naturally the MSM is going to call that racist.  But somehow when it is done to black conservatives, that is simply freedom of speech.  The MSM better be forewarned, we are on to you, and we are on you, as never before, exposing your double standards and your hypocrisies, and your own blatant racism against black conservatives.  MSM – you won’t get away with it anymore.  We (conservatives) are too many.  And you (liberals) are too few.  Will that fact actually stop the MSM from acting stupidly towards black conservatives?  Or will it only make them that much more rabid?