Another Blog From Neosecularist.com

Posts Tagged ‘liberal bias’

Black Hate Against Whites Soar – But You Are Not Supposed To Know Anything About That…

In black racism, crime, hate crime, politics on June 10, 2012 at 9:02 am

This is the face of a black murderer who killed a white woman for no apparent reason. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, along with the MSM, don’t want you to know this crime happened.

Another white person has been brutally killed by a black assailant.  Two, actually.  The other is a fifteen year old boy whose name has not been released.  It should be.  Black on white (hate) crime is getting worse, and yet the lame-stream liberal media could care less.  They, the MSM, as well as those two frauds in a pod, Jackson and Sharpton, are still gushing over the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman incident.  (By the way – where did Trayvon get the money to pay for his gold tooth?)  This woman, as well as the unidentified fifteen year old boy ought to be given the death penalty for their vicious and unprovoked crime against a white woman who was only trying to make a living.  She leaves behind a child, but even that doesn’t matter to liberal garbage who will not report on these stories.  The double standard that the liberal MSM has on these issues is both astounding and damnable.  Ant time a white person even looks at a black person funny, the MSM pounces on that story, billing it is an automatic hate crime, and proof that America is still a racist nation.  However, whenever a black commits a heinous crime against a white (and there are growing examples of this) it is passed off, brushed aside and ignored.  There is a reason for this, and that is because liberals do not accept that blacks, because they are minorities, can, in the legal sense, commit hate crimes.  It’s both a travesty and miscarriage of justice that liberals behave in this hypocritical manner.  A woman is dead – stabbed to death fifty times.  A child is made motherless by two motherless black cowards.  They ought to receive the death penalty and swiftly be executed for this crime – not because it is a hate crime, but because it is murder in cold blood.  Hate crime is a joke and it ought to be abolished in America, and courageous politicians need to stand up and demand it be abolished.  Murder is murder, and for murder in cold blood deserves the death penalty.  You won’t hear race hustlers Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton speaking up on this murder, although they both undoubtedly have read about it.  There’s no money to be made for either of them over this murder.  There’s no glory for wither of them to be found either.  Hate crime is not about compensating the victim and ensuring the attacker is properly punished, it’s all about punishing white for the crimes committed against minorities over 150 years ago.  And it’s also a slush fund and money grab opportunity for race hustlers.  What is most damning about this story, and all the black on white crime stories we are hearing, with more and more frequency, is that despise their increase, despite their shocking brutality, the MSM will still not report on them.  We do understand why that is, don’t we?  We do understand their devious, deceitful and evil intentions for not reporting on these types of stories – don’t we?

Advertisements

Liberal NYT Supports Terrorism Against America (Surprised?)

In politics, terrorism on May 4, 2012 at 8:25 am

NYT commitment to print the latest breaking anti-conservative news will not be hindered, or distracted, by terrorist activities against America.

There’s no other way to describe the complacency, the apathy, the complete non-interest the NYT has in reporting about the conviction of Adis Medunjanin who plotted, but failed, to blow up Grand Central Station than to say that the NYT, in its virtual non-coverage, its lack of serious attention to this thwarted terrorist attack, by literally giving cover (on page A-19 to be exact) to these types of terrorist incidents supports terrorists in a way that is suspiciously incongruous to is role and its responsibility as an American newspaper.  What was more import to the NYT than practicing any semblance or nuance of journalism?  Rupert Murdoch and his fight way the hell over in England over his own news corporation and the scandal he is involved in.  Rupert and his scandal was front page fodder.  Murdoch you know owns FOX News which hosts many leading conservatives and conservative analysis.  It is because of this hatred, this jealously, of FOX News the NYT has completely disregarded and abandoned its duties as a legitimate newspaper so it could spend its time going after Murdoch.  There is some irony here.  How many of it subscribers read the NYT while traveling the Grand Central Station Subway?  Would they be more interested in the circus in England over Murdoch, or about the safety of the subway that takes them to and from work every day?  By putting Murdoch on page one and placing the story of a convicted terrorist on page A-19, which is about the equivalent of an appendix (and unless it is the appendix to the Lord of the Rings, who reads that?), the NYT is in effect giving aid and comfort to a convicted terrorist who, if he had not been caught, might have killed hundreds of people and caused millions of dollars in damage, and just might inspire other wanna-be terrorists to do the same, knowing they too can always count on its ally, the liberal NYT, to keep their terrorist affairs as discreet as possible, and under the radar of its last few remaining subscribers.  Does anyone really want to defend the NYT editorial decision on this?

Hillary Clinton Could Reboot Her Presidential Bid By “Sticking An Unbent Paperclip Up Her Urethra”

In comedians, politics on April 26, 2012 at 1:53 pm

Actually, Jon Stewart made that “joke” on his HBO Comedy Center program about Mitt Romney.  But one has to wonder if he would ever make such a “joke” like that about a Democrat female running for President.  He probably would use that on Sarah Palin or Michele Bachmann, or any conservative woman running for President or any political office, we know that.  But where does Stewart get off making such crude jokes like that about anyone at all?  Hillary, of course, is not running for President this time around, but there is strong indication she may try again in 2016.  Will Stewart still be around then to use the “paperclip up the urethra” joke?  Will Stewart’s program still be around for him to use as a vehicle for his vulgarity?  Would Stewart have the same “courage” to tell Hillary Clinton to stick a paperclip up her urethra to reboot her Presidential bid as he apparently has in telling Mitt Romney?  In the spirit of “equality” among the sexes, shouldn’t he?  Or will he do as all cowardly liberals (which Stewart is) do and keep attacking conservatives with the same vulgarity, the same hypocrisy, the same sexism, as they decry conservatives engaging in, without much evidence to back it up?  Another question is – just where does Stewart get these jokes from, his staff, or does he pull them out of his own…

Could This Picture Of Trayvon Martin Be Worth A Thousand Pardons To George Zimmerman?

In George Zimmerman, photography, politics, Trayvon Martin on April 24, 2012 at 11:46 pm

This image is the photograph the late Trayvon Martin used to represent his Twitter identity in late 2011, under the screen name "T33ZY_TAUGHT_M3." Although the Twitter account was deleted, The Daily Caller retrieved it from the social analytics website PeopleBrowsr. The upper-arm tattoo in the image matches one in a close-up photograph on Martin's MySpace page. (Image: Twitter)

Would the MSM dare show this “adult” picture of Trayvon Martin to its liberal audience?  (Click the photo to read the full story)  For tens of millions of Americans who get their news daily from the MSM, have they seen this rather unflattering and vulgar photo of Trayvon Martin?  Would the MSM ever show this photo, or would they keep on showing older photos of Trayvon, during more “innocent” times in his life?  The liberal MSM has, from the very beginning portrayed Trayvon Martin as the victim of a hate crime; a sweet, lovable, innocent young teenage boy who could not possible commit a crime of any kind, or hurt or harm another living human soul.  The photographs they have used of Trayvon have all been taken from when he was a young teenager. An angelic little boy who could not hurt a fly.  That is what the MSM is saying, subliminally, when it distributes this older photo of Trayvon.  Compare that to the photograph the MSM frequently rehashes of George Zimmerman, Trayvon’s killer.

Zimmerman looks tired, disheveled, mean, gravelly, dirty, nasty, guilty!  That is exactly what the MSM wants everyone to believe, regardless of what the evidence has to say.  And look at this oft rehashed photo of Trayvon and Zimmerman side by side:

Do you see what the MSM is intentionally doing, implying, planting in your head by showing these two photos side by side?  The MSM is saying, “Look, this big, mean, nasty George Zimmerman over here on the right murdered this sweet little boy, Trayvon Martin, on the left.”  But what the MSM is not telling you is that that sweet little boy had done a lot of growing up since the time that photo was taken.  None of that in any way indicates Trayvon’s guilt, and Zimmerman’s innocent, or vice-versa.  However, neither does portraying Zimmerman as an evil white man who murdered the little black boy in the red shirt represented in the above photo automatically indicate Zimmerman’s guilt.  The MSM is playing a shell game with its audience, switching photos, shuffling them around, hiding others, all in the hopes it can pull the wool over your eyes and make you believe Zimmerman is guilty of murder, whether he actually is or not.  The trial has yet to begin, Zimmerman is out on bail and even now the myriad death threats against Zimmerman keep pouring in.  All because of how the MSM has reported on this tragic and disturbing incident from the beginning by portraying Trayvon as the victim and Zimmerman as a cold-blooded murderer, without any evidence, as of yet, to back it up.  The photo of Trayvon giving his middle finger may not be enough to clear Zimmerman, but the shoddy and unprofessional and blatantly biased journalism and media coverage by the MSM just might be enough to set Zimmerman free, if no pertinent evidence can be introduced.  And what is that going to mean if, down the road, sometime after Zimmerman is freed, new evidence pops up to prove Zimmerman actually was guilty of killing Trayvon in cold blood, not in self-defense?  There will be no double jeopardy for Zimmerman, who cannot then be tried a second time for the same crime, but there sure as hell ought to be double trouble for the MSM, and double more after that.

Black On White Crime And The Sound Of Crickets Chirping

In black racism, hate crime, politics on April 24, 2012 at 7:55 pm

Black on white crime – it happens.  And whether it happens in public, and in broad daylight in front of witnesses, if it was to happen right in front of a news camera, with the camera rolling, would the crime still be recorded and reported?  It makes a BIG difference to the liberal MSM whether the crime is white on black or black on white.  A white on black crime is NEWS; it’s a hate crime; and it justifies, from the MSM point of view, the continued charge of white “raaaacism!”  So, why, when it is a black on white crime, and specifically a hate crime, intentionally committed by a black person on a white person solely because the victim is white, are these incidents ignored by the liberal MSM?  Why is there never the charge, by the liberal MSM, of black “raaaacism!”  More than likely because it paints blacks in a bad and negative light.  The same bad light, ironically, the liberal MSM enjoys painting whites in every time a white person commits a crime against, or says or does something of a racist nature to, a black person.  We need to start taking black on white crime just as seriously as we take white on black crime.  We do not expect race-baiters like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton to come to the defense of white victims against their black attackers, as they do with black victims against white attackers, and as they are doing (over-hyping) with the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman case.  And as it turns out, neither of these race-baiting thugs have done that to date.  There are more than enough of us in media that can cover these black on white hate crimes without Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton interfering.  However, we damn well ought to expect media outlets, and that includes the liberal MSM, to do its job and report on these incidents with the same passion, the same human interest and compassion, as they do when it is a white on black crime.  By not doing so, it is unwittingly, perhaps, giving cover and shelter to these racist criminals who are attacking whites. and providing these thugs with the courage to continue attacking whites, knowing little will be done to bring these incident to the public’s attention.  Or – is it that the MSM really doesn‘t have any compassion, any empathy, any interest whatsoever when a black person commits a violent crime against a white person?  Would it surprise anyone if the MSM didn’t?