In abortion, culture, politics, racism, right to life on June 21, 2012 at 10:48 am
A South Carolina Church is in deep trouble with the Arianna Nation for a sign it has posted outside its church doors which reads, “Ultimate Racism – Abortion Targets Black Babies”. This is not a laughter matter to the liberal pro-aborts over there who never miss an opportunity to condemn anyone for trying to stop an abortion, or speak out against it. But when we talk explicitly and candidly about abortion, what abortion really is – the killing of an unborn child – the folks that support the killing of unborn children under the guise of “reproductive choice” become indignant and restless. And that includes other blacks, as the Arianna Nation point out:
The sign was eventually taken down due to pressure from African-American leaders.
So – wouldn’t this problem of abortion go away much faster if only black babies were aborted, and Hispanic and Latino babies as well? And, couldn’t we learn a lot from the Chinese about abortion, and bring that knowledge to America, to every single black and Hispanic and Latino, and Asian, community in America, where that information is sorely welcome and encouraged by other blacks and Hispanics and Latinos?
It isn’t whites killing black babies in the womb. It’s black mothers making the conscious decision to kill their babies in the womb that ultimately leads to the killing of black babies in the womb. Or, if we wanted to take the pro-abort position, what is in that woman’s womb isn’t even a black child to begin with, so that helps to ease the conscience as the abortionist plunges their deadly sharp instrument of torture into her to remove whatever it is inside her womb she things she is better living without.
If that is not a black child inside the womb, then perhaps we can make the case that there is nothing racist with pro-aborts setting up abortion clinics in black neighborhoods and encouraging black women to have abortions, rather than give birth, because they are poor, single, unmarried women whose babies fathers have abandoned them. But, if that is a black child inside the womb, and Planned Parents is encouraging the woman to abort it – what are we supposed to call that? Isn’t that the message this church was trying to convey with its sign?
In hate crime, politics, racism on May 23, 2012 at 10:40 am
My, how loudly the crickets are chirping. Yet another story of a white person (a woman this time) being attacked and beaten up by blacks, and although the woman was referenced as a “white b*tch” by her black assailant, there has not been even a murmur, a hushed whisper within the MSM. Granted, this does not appear to be a premeditated crime. However, if a white gets out of his car because he does not like something the person in the car ahead of him has said, or done, without knowing the person is black, and the white assaults the black, even if it is not premeditated or predicated on the basis of race, wouldn’t the white still be charged with a hate crime anyway? Wouldn’t Jesse “Wormtongue” Jackson and Al “Uncle Tom” Sharpton spearhead the unruly mob to demand that this white person be charged with a hate crime and sentenced appropriately? These typical double standards by the MSM need to be thrown back in their hypocritical faces constantly. What if it turns out this white woman who was attacked by three blacks is a liberal, pro-abortion, pro-Obama, Democrat feminist? What is the MSM to do then? Either abolish “hate” crimes, or apply the rule to everyone equally. The “can’t we all just get along” idea won’t become a reality until we all realize that race as defined by color of skin is irrelevant, and that culture or ethnic background is a wedge issue not part of the so-called melting pot. We are all humans and we are all part of the human race. DNA is absolutely indistinguishable from one human to the next, regardless of color, ethnicity, etc. And one American citizen is no more superior, or no less inferior, to another American citizen. Race- baiters and hustlers like Jackson and Sharpton, Farrakhan and his Nation of Islam, and even the New Black Panther Party will not abide by this. They will continue their assault on the human race for their own financial profit and gain. For their own racist views, for their own “hate” they and their followers will be sucked into that vacuous, infinite nothingness that awaits them all. Is it worth it to you to get sucked in as well? Or can you finally accept that crime against anyone is crime against humanity, and ought to be punished for the sake, for the good of humanity?
In culture, hate crime, racism on May 7, 2012 at 5:38 pm
A big deal has been over the Kent State killings, brought about by protesters throwing beer bottles and rocks at police from three hundred feet away, and whether the fact that police were 300 hundred away, and at a presumably “safe” distance” from actual harm, the four students killed by police, as a result of this violent activity, was unwarranted and unjustified. Well, now we have a story out of Cornell University that “a group of people on the roof of the Sigma Pi fraternity house reportedly threw bottles and other objects at black students who were walking by the house early Sunday morning”. There were also, allegedly, invoking the Trayvon Martin shooting. Now, and this is the most important part – was this group three feet away from these blacks, because just how far a distance they were is imperative to whether or not there was actually any criminal intent, or whether it was a harmless act, according to Jesse Kornbluth, who firmly believes that the protesters at Kent State were unjustifiably shot at because they were three hundred feet away from police when they threw bottles at them. So, the question begs this answer – is there an appropriate distance at which anybody, protesters included, must remain behind when they are throwing bottles, rocks and other objects at people? Or – is throwing anything at anyone, at any distance, inappropriate? Or – is it only appropriate to throw bottles and other objects at police, and only when it is being done by protesters, and liberal protesters at that, as Jesse Kornbluth insinuates? The fate of this group of people who threw “bottles and other objects” at blacks hinges on the answer to this, and to this question – if police happened to be in the area at the time the group was throwing bottles from the roof at black students, and the police opened fire, killing one or more of them, would Jesse Kornbluth have approved of this tactic, and would he have included the killing of these people among “the most popular murders ever committed in America”?
In politics, racism, slavery on May 3, 2012 at 10:20 am
Democrat Wolves in Sheets For Clothing
Liberals will not like this. A neo-Nazi who was running for sheriff of Pinal County as a Democrat has killed his family. He’s dead too. When do we ever hear about a Republican neo-Nazi running for any political office? For that matter, when do we ever hear about a Republican neo-Nazi? Throughout American history it has been Democrats, not Republicans, who have support slavery; who have supported segregation; who have been members of the KKK; who have been the real racists. Juan Williams, as a liberal, will continue to have the audacity, as all liberals do, to call Tea party members racist, but refuse to offer one solid piece of evidence. And, as always, the liberal MSM will continue to ignore it. This story of the Democrat neo-Nazi serves as at least one piece of evidence that Democrats can be racists and are more prone, more capable, more committed to, more sympathetic to, more likely to be and to support, racism. Want another piece of evidence? Google Democrat Senator Robert Byrd. Now – where’s that evidence that the Tea Party is racist?
In politics, racism, Tea Party on May 3, 2012 at 9:54 am
On the Sean Hannity Show, Juan Williams accused the Tea Party movement of being racist. He, along with Michelle Malkin, were guests on the program discussing the Occupy Movement and the support that movement has with President Obama, Nancy Pelosi and most Democrat member of congress, despite its extremely violent nature. When Malkin challenged, and then demanded, Williams offer one piece of evidence for racism in the Tea Party, Williams could not do that, but he refused to retract his statement. This goes to show the hypocrisy of liberals (and Williams is still a liberal, regardless of his break with NPR). Juan Williams has shown himself, in this segment, to be a very shallow, unworthy man. His disapproval of the Tea Party has allowed his emotions to get the better of him and he too has succumbed to the lies that liberals always spread about conservatives – that we are racists. It’s easy to call anyone a racist. But its even easier to call someone a racist and not have to back it up. Juan’s incredible stupid, arrogant comment highlights the desperate nature of liberals, who are in fact losing their battle to take over America from conservatives. One day liberals will wake up and wonder what happened, and how they lost their struggle to redefine America, never knowing, never conceiving, never once accepting it was through their own sheer arrogance, willful deceit of facts and extremely violent nature that did them in. Has anyone ever heard or known of a liberal accepting blame for anything they have done?