Another Blog From Neosecularist.com

Archive for the ‘hate crime’ Category

Black Hate Against Whites Soar – But You Are Not Supposed To Know Anything About That…

In black racism, crime, hate crime, politics on June 10, 2012 at 9:02 am

This is the face of a black murderer who killed a white woman for no apparent reason. Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton, along with the MSM, don’t want you to know this crime happened.

Another white person has been brutally killed by a black assailant.  Two, actually.  The other is a fifteen year old boy whose name has not been released.  It should be.  Black on white (hate) crime is getting worse, and yet the lame-stream liberal media could care less.  They, the MSM, as well as those two frauds in a pod, Jackson and Sharpton, are still gushing over the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman incident.  (By the way – where did Trayvon get the money to pay for his gold tooth?)  This woman, as well as the unidentified fifteen year old boy ought to be given the death penalty for their vicious and unprovoked crime against a white woman who was only trying to make a living.  She leaves behind a child, but even that doesn’t matter to liberal garbage who will not report on these stories.  The double standard that the liberal MSM has on these issues is both astounding and damnable.  Ant time a white person even looks at a black person funny, the MSM pounces on that story, billing it is an automatic hate crime, and proof that America is still a racist nation.  However, whenever a black commits a heinous crime against a white (and there are growing examples of this) it is passed off, brushed aside and ignored.  There is a reason for this, and that is because liberals do not accept that blacks, because they are minorities, can, in the legal sense, commit hate crimes.  It’s both a travesty and miscarriage of justice that liberals behave in this hypocritical manner.  A woman is dead – stabbed to death fifty times.  A child is made motherless by two motherless black cowards.  They ought to receive the death penalty and swiftly be executed for this crime – not because it is a hate crime, but because it is murder in cold blood.  Hate crime is a joke and it ought to be abolished in America, and courageous politicians need to stand up and demand it be abolished.  Murder is murder, and for murder in cold blood deserves the death penalty.  You won’t hear race hustlers Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton speaking up on this murder, although they both undoubtedly have read about it.  There’s no money to be made for either of them over this murder.  There’s no glory for wither of them to be found either.  Hate crime is not about compensating the victim and ensuring the attacker is properly punished, it’s all about punishing white for the crimes committed against minorities over 150 years ago.  And it’s also a slush fund and money grab opportunity for race hustlers.  What is most damning about this story, and all the black on white crime stories we are hearing, with more and more frequency, is that despise their increase, despite their shocking brutality, the MSM will still not report on them.  We do understand why that is, don’t we?  We do understand their devious, deceitful and evil intentions for not reporting on these types of stories – don’t we?

Another “Yawner” For The MSM – White Woman Beaten By Three Blacks

In hate crime, politics, racism on May 23, 2012 at 10:40 am

My, how loudly the crickets are chirping.  Yet another story of a white person (a woman this time) being attacked and beaten up by blacks, and although the woman was referenced as a “white b*tch” by her black assailant, there has not been even a murmur, a hushed whisper within the MSM.  Granted, this does not appear to be a premeditated crime.  However, if a white gets out of his car because he does not like something the person in the car ahead of him has said, or done, without knowing the person is black, and the white assaults the black, even if it is not premeditated or predicated on the basis of race, wouldn’t the white still be charged with a hate crime anyway?  Wouldn’t Jesse “Wormtongue” Jackson and Al “Uncle Tom” Sharpton spearhead the unruly mob to demand that this white person be charged with a hate crime and sentenced appropriately?  These typical double standards by the MSM need to be thrown back in their hypocritical faces constantly.  What if it turns out this white woman who was attacked by three blacks is a liberal, pro-abortion, pro-Obama, Democrat feminist?  What is the MSM to do then?  Either abolish “hate” crimes, or apply the rule to everyone equally.  The “can’t we all just get along” idea won’t become a reality until we all realize that race as defined by color of skin is irrelevant, and that culture or ethnic background is a wedge issue not part of the so-called melting pot.  We are all humans and we are all part of the human race.  DNA is absolutely indistinguishable from one human to the next, regardless of color, ethnicity, etc.  And one American citizen is no more superior, or no less inferior, to another American citizen.  Race- baiters and hustlers like Jackson and Sharpton, Farrakhan and his Nation of Islam, and even the New Black Panther Party will not abide by this.  They will continue their assault on the human race for their own financial profit and gain.  For their own racist views, for their own “hate” they and their followers will be sucked into that vacuous, infinite nothingness that awaits them all.  Is it worth it to you to get sucked in as well?  Or can you finally accept that crime against anyone is crime against humanity, and ought to be punished for the sake, for the good of humanity?

Throwing “Bottles And Other Objects” At Blacks Is Neither Taunting, Provoking Or Criminal – Just Ask Jesse Kornbluth

In culture, hate crime, racism on May 7, 2012 at 5:38 pm

A big deal has been over the Kent State killings, brought about by protesters throwing beer bottles and rocks at police from three hundred feet away, and whether the fact that police were 300 hundred away, and at a presumably “safe” distance” from actual harm, the four students killed by police, as a result of this violent activity, was unwarranted and unjustified.  Well, now we have a story out of Cornell University that  “a group of people on the roof of the Sigma Pi fraternity house reportedly threw bottles and other objects at black students who were walking by the house early Sunday morning”.  There were also, allegedly, invoking the Trayvon Martin shooting.  Now, and this is the most important part – was this group three feet away from these blacks, because just how far a distance they were is imperative to whether or not there was actually any criminal intent, or whether it was a harmless act, according to Jesse Kornbluth, who firmly believes that the protesters at Kent State were unjustifiably shot at because they were three hundred feet away from police when they threw bottles at them.  So, the question begs this answer – is there an appropriate distance at which anybody, protesters included, must remain behind when they are throwing bottles, rocks and other objects at people?  Or – is throwing anything at anyone, at any distance, inappropriate?  Or – is it only appropriate to throw bottles and other objects at police, and only when it is being done by protesters, and liberal protesters at that, as Jesse Kornbluth insinuates?  The fate of this group of people who threw “bottles and other objects” at blacks hinges on the answer to this, and to this question – if police happened to be in the area at the time the group was throwing bottles from the roof at black students, and the police opened fire, killing one or more of them, would Jesse Kornbluth have approved of this tactic, and would he have included the killing of these people among “the most popular murders ever committed in America”?

Mobile, Alabama Mob Attack Against Owens Was Racial, And “Justice For Trayvon Martin” Was A Motivating Factor

In black racism, hate crime, politics, Trayvon Martin on April 26, 2012 at 10:35 am

Terry Rawls was arrested for taking part in the Matthew Owens beating (click photo for story)

An arrest has been made in the Matthew Owens mob attack that left him in critical condition.  A man by the name of Terry Rawls has been arrested.  According to witnesses, the attack was really only between Owens and Rawls, who have had a verbal war, or sorts, going on for three years.  On the day of the attack, apparently some kids were out in the street playing basketball and Owens confronted them.  The kids went back and told their parents, and they all gathered together and went to see about Matthew Owens.  Now the scene is set.  We have our mob of 20 black attackers going to confront Owens because he “fussed” about some kids playing basketball in the street.  (Is that the best and most appropriate place to play basketball or anything else?)  Allegedly racial slurs were slung – but the article does not say who slung them.  In any event tensions escalated to the point were this mob of 20 blacks stopped their verbal assault and began to physically assault Owens with “paint cans, pipes and chairs”.  Also, witnesses claim a women screamed from her car as she was leaving, “That’s justice for Trayvon”.  Now, here we have an instance where there are witnesses, but they are being dismissed.  Yet, there are no witnesses to the Trayvon Martin killing (expect George Zimmerman, who admits killing him, but in self-defense), and yet conclusions have already been drawn about Zimmerman’s guilt.  Let’s assume, for a moment, that the witnesses who made that claim were mistaken.  What was the motivation for 20 blacks to beat up one white person?  Because he told some kids not to play basketball in the street?  Yikes!  How many times do any of us see kids doing something they ought not to be doing because it is dangerous to them and could damage someone’s property?  Wasn’t there a time when we could tell kids to get off the street without worrying about being killed, or near to it,  and they did get off the street?  And their parents scolded the kids for being out in the street, not the person who told them to get off the street?  Or does that only happen on “Leave it to Beaver”, or a television program from the wholesome 1950’s?  And why, if there had been tensions between Owens and Rawls for three years, did it take a mob of 20 blacks to bring it to a climax?  Neighbors do have words with one another over issues. And apparently he and Rawls had had physical altercations before, and police were called, but charges never filed.  What was it about that particular day, that was different from any other day in the previous three years this has been going on?  In other words – had the Trayvon Martin incident never occurred, would a mob of 20 blacks really have gotten together and beat the hell out of a white man because he told their kids not to play basketball in the street?  But Mobile Mayor, Sam Jones, rejects the notion that this crime was in any way racially motivated, or even a hate crime, or spurred on by the Trayvon Martin incident.  So too does Corporal Chris Levy, who is with the Mobile Police Department.  He said, “I can tell you without a doubt 100 percent that the Trayvon Martin case was not the motivating factor.  That 100 percent, it is an ongoing incident between people who have been fighting for a few years now.”  Really?  Let that be a lesson to any of you to think twice when you confront kids out in the street playing basketball, or any game, and doing things they ought not to be doing out in the street because it is dangerous and they could get hurt, and/or damage the cars out there.  First check and make sure they are the same color as you.  (You might still get beaten up, but at least race cannot be claimed as a factor)  And second, make sure there hasn’t been another Trayvon Martin incident in the news for a while that the kids’ parents can use as an excuse and as “justice” when they come to beat you up.  When the day comes when it is a mob of twenty whites beating the hell out of a black, and where one of them is “allegedly” shouting “that’s justice for Zimmerman”, can we expect a mayor, a police officer, anyone of authority, to insist “100 percent” that race and racism was not a motivation or a factor?  And if they did, couldn’t we expect to see that mob grow just a little bit overnight?

Twenty Blacks Beat Up Lone White – But Mayor Says It’s Not A Hate Crime…

In black racism, hate crime, politics, Trayvon Martin on April 25, 2012 at 4:11 pm

Matthew Owens was allegedly beaten by a vicious mob, after which someone uttered the words, "Now that's justice for Trayvon."

Mobile Ala. – Mathew Owens was left in critical condition after being beat up by a a mob of twenty blacks.  Mobile Mayor, Sam Jones, stands committed in his belief that the attack was neither a hate crime, nor had anything to do with race itself.  This, despite the fact that some of Owens attackers allege Owens had spewed racial slurs at them at the time.  Now, which is it?  Either Owens did in fact taunt a group of blacks with racial slurs, who in turn violently attacked him, or Owens was attacked by a mob of blacks simply for being white, and it really is all part of the “Justin for Trayvon” mentality.  Said Jones, “Wait for the facts as far as we’re concerned right now. But, I would caution people to not jump to conclusions right now. This is really very divisive in communities throughout the country, and I don’t think we have any reason to be divisive here because I don’t see any evidence of that.”  It sounds as though Mayor Jones (who is black) is trying to deny reality.  Namely, a group of blacks beat up a white person.  In Jones book, that doesn’t constitute a hate crime, a race issue or racism.  Even the caption in the photo showing Owens in critical condition, and which can be found in the article is skewed.  It says “allegedly beaten by a vicious mob”.  There’s no “allegedly” about it.  The blacks in the “vicious mob” not only do not deny beating up Owens, they give reasons why they did it.  Mayor Jones begs us to “wait” and to not “jump to conclusions” at the same time millions of blacks around America already have in the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman incident.  The article goes on to say “Owens reportedly has a long rap sheet in the area, the station reported. He’s been booked on charges of assault, domestic violence, harassment and public intoxication in the past.”  Just like Trayvon.  But somehow we must accept that Zimmerman is guilty.  If we are supposed to accept Zimmerman is guilty, without the facts, why are we supposed to wait to form an opinion as to whether this mob of blacks is guilty?  Just like Zimmerman, they too admit they did it.  What’s the difference?

Black On White Crime And The Sound Of Crickets Chirping

In black racism, hate crime, politics on April 24, 2012 at 7:55 pm

Black on white crime – it happens.  And whether it happens in public, and in broad daylight in front of witnesses, if it was to happen right in front of a news camera, with the camera rolling, would the crime still be recorded and reported?  It makes a BIG difference to the liberal MSM whether the crime is white on black or black on white.  A white on black crime is NEWS; it’s a hate crime; and it justifies, from the MSM point of view, the continued charge of white “raaaacism!”  So, why, when it is a black on white crime, and specifically a hate crime, intentionally committed by a black person on a white person solely because the victim is white, are these incidents ignored by the liberal MSM?  Why is there never the charge, by the liberal MSM, of black “raaaacism!”  More than likely because it paints blacks in a bad and negative light.  The same bad light, ironically, the liberal MSM enjoys painting whites in every time a white person commits a crime against, or says or does something of a racist nature to, a black person.  We need to start taking black on white crime just as seriously as we take white on black crime.  We do not expect race-baiters like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton to come to the defense of white victims against their black attackers, as they do with black victims against white attackers, and as they are doing (over-hyping) with the Trayvon Martin/George Zimmerman case.  And as it turns out, neither of these race-baiting thugs have done that to date.  There are more than enough of us in media that can cover these black on white hate crimes without Jesse Jackson or Al Sharpton interfering.  However, we damn well ought to expect media outlets, and that includes the liberal MSM, to do its job and report on these incidents with the same passion, the same human interest and compassion, as they do when it is a white on black crime.  By not doing so, it is unwittingly, perhaps, giving cover and shelter to these racist criminals who are attacking whites. and providing these thugs with the courage to continue attacking whites, knowing little will be done to bring these incident to the public’s attention.  Or – is it that the MSM really doesn‘t have any compassion, any empathy, any interest whatsoever when a black person commits a violent crime against a white person?  Would it surprise anyone if the MSM didn’t?